Margareta Serder (1971-)


Möten med PISA

kunskapsmätning som samspel mellan elever och provuppgifter i och om naturvetenskap

Serder, Margareta | MÖTEN MED PISA : kunskapsmätning som samspel mellan elever och provuppgifter i och om naturvetenskap


BoklivArtikelnr: 9789171045577

Denna avhandling utforskar PISA-studien och dess påverkan på svenska elevers vetenskapliga läskunnighet genom en analys av testmetoder och resultat.

  • Utforskar samspel mellan elever och provuppgifter.

  • Fokuserar på naturvetenskaplig kunskapsmätning.

  • I häftad, utgiven 2017.

Typ av bok:
Ny
Pris:
REA-pris259 kr

Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 6-14 vardagar.

Bindning: Häftat band

Bokförlag: Malmö högskola
ISBN: 9789171045577

Omfång: 268 s.
Språk: Svenska
Utgivningsdatum: 2017-04-11

Förlagets information

Malmö studies in educational sciences nr 75 This thesis explores the standardized assessment of students’ scientific literacy by studying test items, frameworks and result reports from the international comparative study Programme for International Student Assessment, PISA. My research concerns the negative trend observed for Swedish students’ results in science reported in international comparisons since 2000. In this thesis, PISA is considered as a specific kind of practice that acts through a certain rationality, which frames how the measurement is constructed and interpreted. The overall aim is to highlight the epistemological and ontological assumptions that are embedded in the assessment of students’ scientific literacy by PISA. Data was constructed by video documentation of collaborative encounters between 21 groups of 15-year-old students and eleven selected items from the PISA scientific literacy assessment. This method enabled an analysis of the students’ reasoning and the difficulties that arose in these encounters. I also conducted a text analysis of selected frameworks and reports produced under the PISA label, analyzing how science and student performance are discursively constructed in these documents. In this thesis, I examine the similarities and differences between two theoretical approaches: one sociocultural and one sociomaterial. Both are used to explore the embedded assumptions of the PISA scientific literacy assessment. The sociocultural perspective focuses on the students’ situated meaning making as they solve the test questions. The sociomaterial perspective finds inspiration in science and technology studies, and takes a performative stance on scientific practice. This thesis has been formed as a hybrid of a compilation thesis and a monograph. It comprises three articles in English, published or still in the process of publication. The measured knowledge in and about science in PISA are based on onto-epistemological assumptions that are connected to science traditions which are mainly monologistic and representational, whereas this thesis proposes a dialogistic and performative stance. One identified assumption is that language is a neutral transmitter of information, which can be unambiguously communicated and translated without losing or gaining new meanings. Another is the assumption of a single unambiguous, primary frame for interpretation of the test questions, and a third that in PISA, science is assumed to be a socially and culturally neutral object for learning. It appears crucial that the students are able, and motivated, to discern and privilege the scientific perspectives and interpretations while engaging with the complexity of the tasks. My analysis suggests that framing the tasks within fictive, everyday situations, as is significant for PISA, contributes to this complexity. Further, the image of science as portrayed in the test items that were studied, risk reproducing stereotypical images of science and scientifically literate people. To PISA, students are mirrors of the school system and even future society. In the analysis of PISA documents, low performers appeared as threats to future society, due to the risk that they would become ineffective citizens. Meanwhile, other studies assert that standardized comparison is a practice that, when frequently repeated, contributes to lower results and an increasing disillusion of low achievers. It is proposed that PISA, rather than to be seen as a knowledge measurement, should be regarded a knowledge actor.


Möten med PISA av Margareta Serder hittar du under Vetenskaplig metod inom Naturvetenskap i huvudkategorin Vetenskap | Teknik.

Sök fler exemplar av denna titelSök fler böcker av Margareta Serder

Recensioner

Laddar…

Logga in på mitt.bokliv.se för att lämna ditt omdöme!

Vanliga frågor om Möten med PISA av Margareta Serder

Boken 'Möten med PISA' av Margareta Serder handlar om den standardiserade bedömningen av elevers vetenskapliga litteracitet och analyserar negativa trender i svenska elevers resultat i naturvetenskap sedan 2000.

Margareta Serder utforskar teman som epistemologiska och ontologiska antaganden bakom bedömningen av vetenskaplig litteracitet, samt hur språk och vetenskap konstrueras diskursivt inom PISA.

Detta exemplar av boken är ett häftat band som omfattar 268 sidor, publicerades av Malmö högskola den 11 april 2017 och ingår i serien Malmö studies in educational sciences, nummer 75.

Du gillar nog också ...

Senast besökt