Bindning: Häftat band
Bokförlag: Iustus
ISBN: 9789177374640
Omfång: 180 s.
Språk: Engelska
Utgivningsdatum: 2026-04-27
Förlagets information
When a machine can draft a legal memorandum in minutes and review thousands of contracts at the press of a button, what remains that is distinctly human about the work of a lawyer? This book develops a comparative account of human intelligence, artificial intelligence, and what the author calls lawyer intelligence, the composite capacity to reason analytically, communicate with precision, navigate social complexity, and bear responsibility within the institutions of the rule of law. By tracing how intelligence operates across the chain of input, processing, and output, Magnus Kristoffersson shows that generative AI is not simply a faster tool for existing tasks, but a force that reshapes what counts as legal skill, who performs it, and on what terms. The analysis highlights a first competence shift already under way, from junior production to senior review, and argues that this is not the endpoint but an early symptom of a deeper professional transformation. Drawing on research from cognitive science, linguistics, legal theory, and computer science, the book identifies the risks of normative semblance, automation-driven deskilling, and scalable error, while proposing an operational framework for when AI should be embraced and when it must be constrained.
When a machine can draft a legal memorandum in minutes and review thousands of contracts at the press of a button, what remains that is distinctly human about the work of a lawyer? This book develops a comparative account of human intelligence, artificial intelligence, and what the author calls lawyer intelligence, the composite capacity to reason analytically, communicate with precision, navigate social complexity, and bear responsibility within the institutions of the rule of law. By tracing how intelligence operates across the chain of input, processing, and output, Magnus Kristoffersson shows that generative AI is not simply a faster tool for existing tasks, but a force that reshapes what counts as legal skill, who performs it, and on what terms.
The analysis highlights a first competence shift already under way, from junior production to senior review, and argues that this is not the endpoint but an early symptom of a deeper professional transformation. Drawing on research from cognitive science, linguistics, legal theory, and computer science, the book identifies the risks of normative semblance, automation-driven deskilling, and scalable error, while proposing an operational framework for when AI should be embraced and when it must be constrained.
